When I first saw this post being circulated on social media I thought it was a joke.
Liberals on Twitter were passing around a report from the Huffington Post citing that a “small” nuclear war could actually be a good thing.
You know what’s good for climate change? Nuclear War
— Alchemical Daddy (@AlchemicalDaddy) February 25, 2022
From the Huffington Post:
While the global cooling caused by superpower-on-superpower war could be catastrophic (hence the term “nuclear winter”) a small scale war could have an impact on the world climate, says National Geographic. Models suggest that though the world is currently in a warming trend, small-scale war could lower global temperatures 2.25 degrees F for two-to-three years following war.
I want to remind you that climate change activists in the United States had NASA conduct a study if a small scale nuclear war would stop climate change? The result was yes. Would world leaders do such a thing if they view climate change as an existential threat?
— Ken (@FedUpKen) March 1, 2022
Oh, and Time magazine is in on the act as well citing that a small nuclear war would cool the planet:
Even a small exchange of nuclear weapons–between 50-100 Hiroshima-sized bombs, which India and Pakistan already have their in arsenal–would produce enough soot and smoke to block out sunlight, cool the planet, and produce climate change unprecedented in recorded human history.
The left is so desperate about controlling us through climate change policy that they are willing to talk about a possible nuclear war.
With COVID winding down this is going to be the next battle where you will see people censored from social media for not agreeing with the “science.” The preposterous claim that a nuclear war could be a good thing shows you just how cultish the left is.
Huffington Post | Time Magazine