The Washington Post has claimed to have new evidence that serves as proof that the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, ordered interference in the 2016 Presidential elections. The Post also claims that this evidence was collected by the Central Intelligence Agency.
Oddly enough, their vague description of ‘evidence’ leaves the reader nothing to really go on. Imagine that. They’ve also reported that President Trump has been briefed on the matter, by the CIA, but refrain from disclosing much about the ‘news’ they’ve spread. We do not know if this is audio, hearsay, or video evidence but that the alleged CIA briefing was followed up by the President meeting with the then FBI director, James Comey, over the Fusion GPS project. It’s all just speculation at this point but you can believe the liberals are going to run with this one. This is what the article Intels.
As Reported By Allahpundit with HotAir.
A spicy morsel from aย loooong behind-the-scenes WaPo pieceย about Trump doggedly resisting the idea that Russia helped him, intentionally or not, by taking โactive measuresโ against Hillary and the Democrats. Precisely how the CIA โcapturedโ Putinโs orders is left unsaid, of course, but the way WaPoโs story is written makes it sound like they have first-hand knowledge, not second-hand. Meaning โฆ audio?
If so, how on earth did they get that? And if they do have hard evidence, has it been played for Doubting Donald?
WaPoโs describing the January 6 briefing on Russiagate at Trump Tower for the president-elect by Americaโs four intel chiefs. This is the same briefing after which Comey sat down privately with Trump and told him about the infamous Fusion GPS dossier.
Following a rehearsed plan, Clapper functioned as moderator, yielding to Brennan and others on key points in the briefing, which covered the most highly classified information U.S. spy agencies had assembled, including an extraordinary CIA stream of intelligence that had captured Putinโs specific instructions on the operation.
Could be theyโre referring to instructions transmitted by a deputy via email, but I donโt know if the NSA intercepting that would qualify as โextraordinary.โ โExtraordinaryโ and โcaptureโ suggest something special, presumably directly involving Putin himself. Any reason to believe thatโs possible? Well,ย WaPoย reported back in January that U.S. intelligence had captured โcommunicationsโ of senior Russian officials celebrating Trumpโs victory…
Keep Reading More Here:ย Report: CIA Captured Putinโs Specific Instructions On Russian Campaign Interference Operations Last Year




