Skip to content
Independent reporting

Why Do Dems Continue To Defend Racist Islam Leader Louis Farrakhan? [Video]

Why Do Dems Continue To Defend Racist Islam Leader Louis Farrakhan? [Video]
Share X Facebook Email

Heated Debate About Democrats’ support of the bigoted Islamic leader Louis Farrakhan Explodes On Air.

Louis Farrakhan, known for his hate-filled anti-semantic and anti-white rallies, is apparently a sore subject for Democrats. The left continues to support this racist violence-inciter despite using racism to soak-upย votes by pretending to care.

Farrakhan is such a sensitive subject for the liberals. As seen on Fox News’ interview on the subject where Antion Seawriteย deflects and talks over any voice of reason. Take a look.

Watch

The Atlantic magazine faced backlash Sunday after publishing a piece that attempted to justify why Women’s March co-founder Tamika Mallory has declined to cut ties with anti-Semitic Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, Fox New Reported.

Theย piece by Atlantic senior editorย Adam Serwer explained that “because of the [Nation of Islam’s] ongoing presence in many poor and working class black communities, time and again Farrakhan is able to threaten the mainstream political ambitions of black public figures who, for good reasons and bad, choose to deal with him.”

“[Many] black people,” Serwer added, “come into contact with the Nation of Islam as a force in impoverished black communities … who have been written off or abandoned by white society.

As written By ADAM SERWERย with The Atlantic:

The national co-chair of the Womenโ€™s March, Tamika Mallory, was present at the Nation of Islamโ€™s annual Saviourโ€™s Day event in late February, whereย Farrakhan railed againstย Jews for being โ€œthe mother and father of apartheid,โ€ declared that โ€œthe Jews have control over those agencies of government,โ€ and surmised that Jews have chemically induced homosexuality in black men through marijuana. The Nation continues to produce volumes of propaganda blaming Jews for the worldโ€™s ills. After the Anti-Defamation League posted a write-up of the event noting Malloryโ€™s presence, Mallory and her colleagues were accused of dismissing the concerns of critics on social media who felt they were, if not endorsing anti-Semitism, homophobia, and sexism, failing to publicly rebuke it.

โ€œThere were people speaking to me as if I was anything other than my motherโ€™s childโ€”it was very vile, the language that was being used, the way I was called an anti-Semite,โ€ Mallory told me. โ€œI think that my value to the work I do is that I can go into many spaces as it relates to dealing with the complexity of the black experience in America. It takes a lot of different types of people to help us with our struggle.โ€

Then thereโ€™s the timingโ€”at a moment of rising anti-Semitism in the United States and abroad, resurgent white nationalism, and anxiety among many liberal Jews about their place in the progressive movement, Malloryโ€™s presence at the NOI event shocked many who identified with the Womenโ€™s March…

There Is So Much More- Keep Reading Here:ย ย Why Tamika Mallory Wonโ€™t Condemn Farrakhan

 

Share X Facebook Email

The Daily Brief

The dayโ€™s essential headlines, without the noise.

A concise briefing delivered directly to your inbox.

Free to join. Unsubscribe any time.

Powered by Reach Response