Liberal’s high hopes to charge President Trump with Obstruction of Justice should be dead in the water. Havard Law Professor, Alan Dershowitz, appeared yet again on Fox to tear holes through Democrat’s hopes and dreams of bringing Trump down. It should be noted that Alan is a lifelong Democrat. He’s not necessarily a Trump supported but after reviewing the ridiculous behavior of his own party, he should be!
The Professor did not mince words and plainly stated that President Trump could not be brought up on obstruction charges because he has committed no crime. Everything Trump has done thus far has been within his legal rights to do so. If Trump wanted to ‘obstruct’ justice he would have pardoned Flynn. Even that would be within his presidential rights.
As Reported By Seen First on Fox Insider:
Harvard Law School professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz disagreed with claims that there is an obstruction of justice case building against President Donald Trump, calling it “hope over reality” from some Democrats.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said on “Meet the Press” that a Senate investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 presidential election has revealed possible obstruction.
“I see it in the hyper-frenetic attitude of the White House, the comments every day, the continual tweets. And I see it most importantly in what happened with the firing of Director Comey, and it is my belief that that is directly because he did not agree to ‘lift the cloud’ of the Russia investigation. That’s obstruction of justice,” Feinstein said.
On “Fox & Friends,” Dershowitz countered that Trump had the constitutional power to fire FBI Director James Comey and to tell the Justice Department who to investigate and who not to investigate.
“If Congress were ever to charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article II, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” Dershowitz said…